AI Intelligence · Hong Kong · Tokenized Assets
A structured reference for every digital green bond, tokenized fund and on-chain asset issued under Hong Kong's regulatory framework — built for analysts who cite their sources.
Coverage
Three asset categories under Hong Kong's regulatory perimeter — each entry traced back to a named, public primary source.
Every tranche of the HKSAR Government's tokenized green bond programme — ISIN, coupon, tenor and settlement rail — sourced from HKMA announcements and the Hong Kong Government Bond Programme.
Regulated tokenized money market and investment funds issued under Hong Kong's framework — Franklin OnChain HK, the ChinaAMC HKD Digital fund and others — with NAV cadence and authorisation status.
The DLT infrastructure beneath each issuance — HSBC Orion, the CMU's digital platform and Project Ensemble participants — so you can trace where an asset is actually settled, not just who issued it.
The Database
3rd Digital Green Bond
Government of HKSAR
Franklin OnChain US Gov MMF
Franklin Templeton
ChinaAMC HKD Digital MMF
ChinaAMC (Hong Kong)
2nd Digital Green Bonds
Government of HKSAR
1st Tokenised Green Bond
Government of HKSAR
Ensemble Project
HKMA
Why RWA Radar
Every field on every Asset Card links back to the primary document it came from — a government portal, a regulatory filing, an issuer prospectus. No press summaries, no unattributed estimates. You can verify anything we publish in under a minute.
Each issuance is expressed in one consistent schema: ISIN, Issuer, Coupon, Maturity, Settlement Rail and Status. Comparison across issuances becomes a query rather than a research project — which is the difference between a database and an archive.
The only reference focused on Hong Kong and Asia's permissioned-chain real-world assets. We started where regulatory clarity is highest and issuance is most traceable; Singapore and the wider Asia-Pacific market follow on the roadmap.
Data Integrity
Every entry in the database originates from a publicly accessible primary source. We do not accept issuer submissions, synthesise figures from secondary press coverage, or infer data points that are not explicitly stated in an authoritative document. That discipline is the only way to build a reference practitioners can actually cite.
When a field cannot be confirmed from a government announcement, a regulatory filing, an issuer disclosure or a recognised standards body, we show a dash rather than a best guess. An honest gap is more useful to a researcher than a confident error.